first of all, i have to admit that i had BIG issue at first. the cpu was stuck at 500mhz. i tried an 3600 and it was the same so i had a bios issue with the msi b550m pro vdh wifi. i had to put the FIRST bios available and then, the cpu ran at 4.4ghz. i can run ATS, forza horizon in ultra with a 35% cpu usage. Really quick and cool. just have a nzxt m22 cooler and never go over 46 celsius.I was able to find this 3600x for around 290 tx inc so it was cheaper than the 3600.

Works great. I got this as a backup CPU for AM4 slot and I hardly ever use over 50% CPU unless I'm 3d modelling or rendering

This CPU is amazing. It is great at everything. It can game, multitask, stream, productivity, and more. It’s priced good enough that even if you just want it for general computing it’s still great. This thing comes pushed to the limit straight out of the box pretty much. Traditionally I overclock every CPU I buy but with this one AMD have pretty much pushed them to the max for us. Which is great because it’s plug n play! Mine with PBO and Thermal Limits set to max stays around 4.250ghz on all cores gaming under full load with 1 of the 6 cores boosting to 4.35-4.15ghz. So in a game 5 cores will be at 4.250 ghz and one core will always be around 4.35-4.15ghz with that 1 core alternating so they take turns. This gives great ipc and single threaded performance as well as multithreaded. This gives high FPS in games due to the strong single core performance than a 4.3ghz all core overclock gets. You can basically set PBO to max and TBU to max and your motherboard and system will boost it as high as it can. It’s amazing it’s literally drop it in and your good to go this time around. No overclocking needed. I have this CPU in the Asus Prime X570-Pro motherboard if anyone was curious. It was 260 dollar board so it’s pretty nice imo. So your numbers may be different than mine. For cooling I’m using a simple Cooler Master Hyper 212 Evo in Push/Pull with twin fans. Keeps my CPU in the mid 30sC idle, in the 50sC in gaming rather it’s an hour or all day long. Under Prime 95 stress test it topped out at 76C then dropped back to 74C and stayed there. For a 35 dollar cooler pretty insane. I have great case air flow so if you do not do not expect these results. The best way to get more performance from your Ryzen CPU since it’s basically pushed to the max out of the box is via memory. You can look it up if you wish. Memory speed significantly effects your cpus performance at least in gaming. It was shown going from 2666mhz to 3600mhz memory speed in games was giving huge FPS increases. In almost all games 10-20 FPS increase with some games increasing as much as 30-40fps. So if you buy a Ryzen CPU for the love of god buy 3600mhz memory with it. I have 32GB of G.Skill Ripjaws in mine all running at 3600mhz and that’s using all 4 dimm slots 4x8GB sticks in duel channel mode. Fast memory paired with this CPU in a good motherboard means you don’t have to overclock or touch anything this time around and you get amazing performance in all regards. I have my 3600x and 3600mhz memory paired with a RTX 2070 Super that is overclocked really well and I am playing any games I want at 1440P maxed out getting 100+ FPS in pretty much everything. If you want a nice CPU for gaming, streaming, content creation, or anything else well you’re looking at one. At this point in time the Ryzen 3600XT is out now which is basically this exact CPU except it runs around 4.6ghz in the boosting alternative core and probably around 4.4 on the other 5 core. So you gain roughly about 200mhz over this 3600x by going with the XT. Rather that’s worth it well that’s up to you. At most the difference in FPS between the two might be 5 FPS at max. So just get whichever is the best deal. Even the Ryzen 3600 non X or non XT does very very similar in performance to the X and XT and is 150 dollars right now. Everything I said pretty much applies to all 3 CPUs they are just an amazing gaming chip.

Vengo de un IC2 Quad @ 2.66GHz del 2008 y este procesador es otra historia, buscaba algo potente sobre todo para ayudarme en el trabajo con temas de virtualizacion y por supuesto para algun juego algo potente apoyado con una buena tarjeta de video.Posiblemente por 100 Euros mas puedas comprarte un Ryzen 7 x2700 con mas nucleos (similar en rendimiento segun he leido) pero los threads del Ryzen 5 x3600 hacen que el ordenador vuele si dispones de un buen hardware. Esta en conjuncion con una placa base MSI B450 Mortar MAX con 32Gb@3200MHz de RAM y disco SSD SATA III, y tarjeta de video XFX Radeon R570, Funcionando perfectamente.El disipador es bastante grande y el oficial de AMD, hasta el momento dentro de mi caja con ventiladores de entrada y salida de aire y con un uso habitual de virtualizacion, internet y ofimatica, la temperatura del procesador anda sobre los 40º junto con la placa base.Si eres un poco friki, siempre puedes ir a una refrigeracion por agua por unos 60 euros, pero para usus medios el disipador con su ventilador sobra para los 95W de consumo.En general, AMD me ha vuelto a sorprender.

While the 3600 is the CPU of choice for most, the 3600x is worth buying too if the price differential isn't much. In my case it was a mere 900 rupees during one of th amazon sale days. For that you get:I) A better CPU cooler if you plan to run at default stock speedsII) Better binned cores - I see 5/6 cores running upto 4.4 GHz in my sampleIII) Better memory controller - mine does 3800 easy on micron e-die.IV) This sample maintains 1900 IF speeds without instability.

I have built 4 computers with the 3600 and 3600X (for friends/family) since they released, they are all running great with stellar performance for productivity and gaming (realistic scenarios, with discord, spotify, chrome, and the game running at the same time). 100% I'd recommend these processors over rival intel chips, despite the possible 5% framerate difference you might see in benchmarks. Not only do these provide a better frame-time stability than the 9600k, they give you a great upgrade path for the future, and provide some extra features such as low-cost motherboards with overclocking support, included coolers, etc. This is coming from somebody who also owns i7 and i9 intel computers.

Great CPU. Only buy it if it's on sale though; the extra price isn't justified given it's 5% performance gain over the 3600. I bought it on sale when it cheaper than the 3600! It gets excellent single threaded performance, scoring a 528.5 after running the CPU-Z stress test for 15 minutes. The problem with CPU-Z is that your initial performance will be better than your sustained performance, as it will heat up and overclock itself less to reduce the heat load. I got a sustained 4160 on CPUZ for multithreaded performance.Also; the temperature sensing algorithm is not like intel or older gen AMD CPU's. It only outputs the temperature of the hottest CPU core. It also doesn't use a time smoothing algorithm like most other CPU's do. Most other CPU's will average over the last 5 or so temperature readings when reporting the temperature. This would be the reported CPU temperature, which would then be offset by a certain value to produce the effective temperature which the fan uses to set it's speed. Ryzen cpu's just provide the current temperature value as the reported value, and it only provides the hottest core temp. This is done because of the way precision boost overclocks your CPU. They want it to be as up to date and conservative as possible.As a result you will see random temperature spikes on idle. This is normal; the cpu will be given a task randomly and it will overclock itself and finish it faster, but as a result it's temperature will briefly spike up. Of course this is only the temperature of the hottest core. It will quickly go back down to it's baseline. If using the stock cooler I suggest you go into the BIOS and set it's minimum fan speed to 50%, and have it increase after 50 degrees celsius. This ensures that you won't hear the fan rev up while idle, as it won't go beyond 50 degrees while idle.As a final note don't bother overclocking this. Precision boost will already overclock it essentially as high as it can comfortably go with the available cooling. If you want get an aftermarket cooler and precision boost will overclock it higher as the temperature will be lower. Only manually overclock if you want to go above 4.3-4.4 ghz.

Upgraded from the Ryzen 7-1700. Fixed all the frame rate micro stutters in my games! All games are running smoooth like butter. It's not the best gaming CPU out there, but it definitely works VERY well. I am glad to throw the underdog my money. It's not all about high fps, but smooth consistent frames. Bar none, the BEST all around CPU for the money. Great productivity, and runs games well during down time. Well worth every penny. Go AMD! (Shipping was insane! Was less than 24 hours and even delivered on Sunday!)

Update 20th January 2020:I upgraded to a 3900x. I've been using it for a couple of weeks and l'm loving it. A few things to note for those of you Ryzen 3rd Gen. users and prospective buyers:1. Voltage offset is your friend. In my case and with my specific MOBO (Asus C6H - x370) the different Ryzen CPUs I had (3600x, 3700x and now 3900x) behaved in the same way:- High voltage at idle up to 1.5V- (Thus) 'high' idle temps: around 37-45ºC- Around 1.2-1.3V at load, temps around 60ºC (ranging from 55 to 65ºC on a Corsair H150i Pro, quiet pump and all fans spinning around 800 RPMs).I don't care what "Robert" from AMD says and I surely don't trust him; I trust the numbers I get on my PC. So, if you want a quieter, more efficient, longer lasting (probably) Ryzen 3rd. Gen. CPU, I advise to go the 'voltage offset' route. Personally, I have my chip set to -1.0V so the 3900x never has more than 1.4V fed to it (I did the same on the 3700x; l actually had this CPU with a 1.250V undervolt and it did just as good as stock. I haven't tried to go so 'low' on voltage on the 3900x yet. I bet it'll work just fine, but until I try it I won't know for certain). I have run benchmarks (games, Cinebench) and I get slightly better results with the offset voltage. YMMV.2. If you want a totally silent PC experience (and have the appropriate components you'll need for it), I suggest you set a fan curve where fans won't spin up until the CPU reaches 62-63ºC AND you set the fans to have around 3 to 5 seconds response delay (you can actually set normal fan curves as long as you have a 5 seconds response delay. Just observe the CPU behavior and you'll understand the *rational for this).*This is all about trying to get around the 'low usage' and 'high voltage' Ryzen 3rd. Gen. behavior. Open an app and it'll boost up to its max., having the voltage fed to it to its max., too. This causes the temps to go much higher than at idle but just for literally a couple/few seconds. I've noticed the CPU won't care whether my fans are spinning at 2000 or 700 RPMs: it will still reach such temps. and settle there.Thus, the way to go is what l mentioned above. That way, your fans won't bother what the CPU is doing and will only spin up when the CPU truly needs it (beyond 62-63ºC). Funny enough that will hardly ever happen (almost never in my system) as, unless you don't have the appropriate airflow, your 3rd Gen. Ryzen CPU will hardly go beyond the aforementioned temps. Sure enough, again, your temps will vary according to the airflow in your case and ambient temps.3. I don't think l have noticed a significant improvement when going from the 3600x to the 3700x and then to the 3900x (as expected). All these CPUs are pretty snappy and a joy to use (once it's all properly configured). Unless you have a workload that requires more than 6 cores OR you are an enthusiast like me who gets thrilled just by thinking you have a 12 cores and 24 threads CPU, you're probably better off with the 3600 (even the non x).If you aren't planning to change the CPU until 3 years or beyond (and you like gaming) l'd probably buy the 3700x. Games like Battlefield V do use those 8 cores and even 12! I've seen "BV" using 54% of the 3900x (that's using those 12 cores fully and some of one thread) and I see up to 64% usage when 'loading' the game "COD MW 2019" or the next level. That is insane.If you aren't a gamer, an enthusiast and/or you won't utilize applications that take advantage of extra cores, then, really, go and get a 3400G. It's an excellent CPU (on daily, 'normal' usage you wouldn't notice a big difference between that one and the 3900x. Of course there is a difference, but not the one you may have in mind; not a 4 VS 12 cores difference.I got a 3400G for my wife and she can't be happier. Mind you, l would've gotten her the best available in the market had l thought a difference was to be found (for her PC usage). The 3400G will save you money (cheaper, no GPU needed, less powerful PSU required... even the electricity bill will be cheaper... ;-)Girls and boys, if you have questions, down in the comments. I hope this helps!Update 1st October 2019:I switched to a 3700x. The only difference l notice between the 3600x and the 3700x is when looking at MSI Afterburner OSD overlay while playing Battlefield V. Now, CPU usage is a lot less than before. If you're just a gamer you should be more than fine with the 3600x, l surely was. It just that seeing that high CPU usage while playing BV was bugging me (YMMV, as ever).The 3700x at stock (PBO off) is hitting advertised clocks in most cores. More importantly, idle voltage and temps are now settled after upgrading to BIOS 7501 (on an Asus C6H x370). I'm using Ryzen Balanced Windows Power Plan.So yeah, so far so good. Boy this's been a journey!I guess l'll now wait for an offer on the 3900x, not because l need it (not by any means!) but because l can and l am a PC enthusiast. Having 6 cores is good, 8 is great and 12 is awesome. 16 cores, l hear you say? Yeah, bring them on baby!Update 18th September 2019:- Upgraded to 5 STARS. At this price (I paid GBP 220, bought from Amazon), this CPU is amazing.- Added picture showing 2 cores reaching 4468MHz (HWinfo).- Waiting for BIOS update of 30th September.I continue being very happy with this CPU. It's snappy and fast. I have observed games like "Battlefield V" using it up to 90%. The game runs as smooth as you would want it (paired to a MSI RTX 2080 Gaming X Trio) and it's a joy to play.Now, my plan is to upgrade to a better Ryzen CPU next year and hopefully keep it for a few years (I'd buy an 8 cores minimum). If you buy a CPU having in mind to keep it for 3+ years, and you like playing games that utilize 8 or more cores if available (like "BV" does) then I would suggest you going for a 3700x instead. It'll be a better buy in that case scenario.Update (a week after purchase):I got into terms with this CPU and decided to keep it.After a week of daily usage l can tell this processor is faster and snappier than the one it’s replacing, a 1700x@3.9Ghz.The only problem I found is the idle temperatures are ‘somehow’ hotter than the 1700x (even when OC). Basically, when idling, the 3600x temperature jumps from around 35°C all the way to 60-63°C. It is a strange, ‘restless’ behavior (see my system’s specs at the bottom).I have come into terms with this by readjusting the fans’ curve. In any case, the fans every now and then rev up to speeds they never reached before (past 2000Rpms in the case of the CPU fans when the latter occasionally reaches 73°C for a few seconds while loading a game). This happens rarely, but I’ve seeing it.In most cases, while gaming or stress testing, the CPU tends to sit at 60-63°C with an ambient temperature of around 20°C. For example, playing Battlefield V (3840x1200@120Hz), as you can see in the (lousy) uploaded pictures. I’d happily say this CPU is pretty cool under load.Another ‘weird’ thing I observed is the voltage. At idle, 1.4V; under load 1.3V. I think this is why the CPU is hot and jumpy when idling VS cooler and more stable under load. I researched online and found that the higher idle voltage is meant to ‘assist’ the 1-2 cores higher clock speed, whereas the lower voltage under load is because of the slower 6 clocks core speed.Speaking of clock speed, my processor has no problem reaching the advertised 4.4Ghz and even 4.450Ghz occasionally. While playing games it sits at 4.275-4.3Ghz, often speeding up to 4.375Ghz. I used “GPU Tweak II” to see the CPU’s behavior ‘while playing games’ and “HWmonitor” to monitor it in general.One thing to notice is the CPU cooler l’m using: an AIO 360mm Corsair H150i PRO with 3x Be Quiet Silent Wings 3 fans. Keep in mind your clock speed and you temps may vary when pairing the 3600x with a different, less efficient cooler.I’ll try to take and add new, more informative pictures when l have the time.All in all, if you’re coming from a 1700x/2700x or slower, I’d recommend the upgrade if you’re looking for a faster ‘Single Core (SC)’ speed and a snappier feeling when using the PC (e.g. opening programs, loading websites, etc.). (Bear in mind, around half a year ago I tried the 2700x on my rig but l sent it back due to not noticing any improvement compared to my 1700x.)I keep the 4 stars rating due to the 'weird idle behavior'. Otherwise this CPU would completely deserve 5 stars. Price to performance it is a 5 stars CPU.My rig:- 3600x- C6H (x370)- RTX 2080 Strix- Corsair H150i PRO (with 3x Be Quiet Silent Wings 3)- NVME Samsung 960 PRO- 3200Mhz – 16GB RAM – Corsair Dominator Platinum- EVGA T2 - 850w- Be Quiet Dark Base 900 Pro……………………………….(*As a side note and in order to help prospective buyers decide between this CPU and the 3700x.)If your usage is like mine (Word, 20+ tabs/two windows internet browsing, gaming AAA games, listening to music and watching movies) then this CPU will surely serve you very well. I would certainly also explore Intel options (specifically the 9700K if on offer).I’ve had an 8 cores CPU (the aforementioned 1700x) and trust me, if you want a fast, snappy feeling on your PC, you want high SC performance. Leave all those 8 cores for ‘video editors’ and other users of applications that utilize a high core/thread count.‘Future proofing,’ I hear you say? I laugh at that concept. My beloved 1700x bought in the best region of the world (Cambridge, Massachusetts) in May 2017 (yeah, I was a Zen early adopter) is already outdated by a 6 cores CPU, 2 years later. There is no ‘future proofing’ in technology. Now, if you can’t afford an upgrade every 2 years or you just don’t bother, then surely, aim at the best you can buy today. I would then pay the extra 80 GBP and get the 3700x because those extra 2 cores may come handy in the coming 4-5 years. If your PC usage is like mine and you’re like me in that you’re already thinking of the new Ryzen CPU (Zen 5?) then get this one and save those 80 GBP for the next Ryzen generation.‘Some games use 8 cores,’ you say. Well, check games benchmarks and tell me what the difference is: 5fps? 8fps in the best case scenario? Will you notice that? I surely won’t.……………………………….(Initial review.)I have mixed feelings about the 3600x.On one hand it 'feels' snappier and faster than my old and trusty 1700x (even when OC to 3.9Ghz), on the other hand the 3600x runs hotter when idling.My PC was silent until upgrading to the 3600x. I can now hear the 3x Be Quiet Silent Wings 3 fans revving up (installed on a 360mm AIO Corsair 150i PRO) at idle. Ambient temperature: 19°C.The CPU reaches the advertised speed and l have seen it surpassing it, too (see pictures attached). When all cores are in use it seats at 4.09 while aleatory changing the speed of 1 core to 4.124Mhz (when benchmarking Cinebench r15 MC).So far it gets 4 stars because it runs significantly hotter than the 1700x (3.9Ghz OC) at idle. When gaming (BV) it sits at around 63-65°C (see attached pictures) (Front door of my case opened, 3x 140mm Be Quiet Silent Wings 3 located at the case front running at full speed).Conclusion, after a few hours of testing (To be updated):- It feels snappier/faster than a 1700x (OC to 3.9Ghz) when opening programs and ‘normal usage’. This time it’s not only about ‘numbers’ (benchmarks) but you can ‘feel’ the difference.- It runs hotter than a 1700x (even when OC to 3.9Ghz).- Metro Exodus Benchmark: l get the very same results with the 3600x and the 1700x on this benchmark. I guess l’m GPU limited/bottlenecked (but just to say).One star off because of the temps at idle. l'll conduct further testing and come back to update this review in a week.

TLDR: Don't underestimate the GTX 10 series graphics cards and drop $2000 on an RTX, when in reality it's the rest of your PC that's bottlenecking you! CPU's and DDR4 have had the best year ever for gamers, and GPU's just don't have much to offer over a few years ago. Why do you think Nvidia went all in on raytracing? it's because they are reaching the physical limits of GPU potential and are now adding features to make sales. CPU's are getting close to that point too so now is the time to buy one! Then wait 5 years, for the next breakthrough technology.I upgraded to DDR4, but kept my GTX 1080. This made an incredible difference! Not sure if it's the 3600x alone or if it's the sheer bandwidth of DDR4, but between the two, my graphics card is no longer bottlenecked and can achieve its full potential.You have to realize as well, I upgraded from the FX-8350, and 8 core 4.2 ghx CPU, it was the top of the line like 10 years ago and held strong even today, playing Fallout 4 on ultra settings at 4k 30fps. I wanted to upgrade to the RTX 2080 to get to 60fps, but it turns out that wouldn't have helped, because what I needed was the 3600xNow I run Fallout 4 on ultra at 4k well over 60fps in even the most demanding situations, using a GTX 1080Let me say that again, 4k60, with a GTX 1080... Sorry, im just really impressed!!!Right now I'm playing Plague Tale on ultra 4k, averaging about 44fps, which is more than acceptable :)