PC4Uさんはアスクさんのショップなので、戦略的な価格で発売しています。５万円台で HPC向けの CPUが手に入るので、コスパはバツグンです。ただ、惜しむらくは対応マザーがほとんど無くなりつつあることです。高い値段のマザーならまだありますけど、安い価格帯にてコレが使えるマザーはほとんど無いので、マザー代が高く付いて、CPUで得した分は消えるかも。気をつけることは、それなりに発熱があるので、冷却対策も簡易水冷あたりが必要になってきます。なので、あまり自作経験が無い人にはお勧めできません。そこそこ自作経験があって、対応マザーの目処が立つ人はお勧めです。第三世代になってしまったら、まさにハイエンドのコア数とお値段になってしまったので、HPC組みたいけどそんなにコア数要らないし、お金も節約したい人にもお勧めできるかと。

I have nothing to say. You have experienced this processor. It's like V8 SRT Jeep Cherokee... Don't step on it too hard.

Now that the newer 3rd gen stuff is out, if you can get these on a good sale, they are fantastic. I had the 1900x before and then used these as an upgrade and so far I am seeing better frames in games and I love havythe extra overhead for when I stream. If you already have a TR4 motherboard they are an easy install. If you don't, I don't know that I would recommend it now as the third Gen Threadripper has a different socket. Overall verily happy with this CPU

La gama Threadripper de AMD, posiblemente no es el procesador para todos los usuarios, pero si tu trabajo es con ordenadores en casi cual ámbito as de plantearte este tipo de procesadores mastodonticos, pero son los procesadores con mejor prestaciones del mercado relación potencia precio. cuadruplicando la potencia de los Ryzen de escritorio de su momento. y en muchas prestaciones su modelos de gama media estan por precio muy cercanos a sus equivalentes en Ryzen de escritorio o incluso mas baratos, por ejemplo este es 150€ mas económico que el Ryzen 3900x con el mismo numero de nucleos, y con una velocidad muy similar, si los Ryzende 3º gen son mas rápidos y con mejor IPC, pero es que los Threadripper de 3º gen aun no se han puesto a la vista y con la escalavilidad de Cuadruplicar potencia, ya se esta hablando de Ryzen Threadripper de 64Cores 128 Hilos por unos 3000€. Una verdadera mole que es compatible con este soket

This processor is like having the digital equivalent of a Semi Truck Drag Racer.I went from trying to simultaneously run databases, programming software, emulation software, graphic and video software on an i7-980X (which I still use for other things) to this processor...Am I happy with the performance of this processor?...Insert Big Goofy Grin HERE---> :-)

マルチタスクは優秀だが、シングルはイマイチ熊印のグリス+簡易水冷でも熱落ちの可能性アリ2950w以下でも良いと思うの以下感想流石32/64ですね黒い砂漠とマイクラとDiscordとChromeでyoutube垂れ流しをしてHyperVで8コアUbuntuと8コアCentOSをしても全然重くならないですこのまま7daysやARKを開いても"全体的に重くなること"は無さそうですねただ、クロック数は低めなので1つのソフトの負荷が大きくなるとそのソフトだけどうしてもカクつきますなのでやっぱりゲーミングには向きませんが、AをやりながらBとCとDをやる、みたいに複数の作業をやるのであれば輝きますまた、この時期になってくると気温が高くなるのもあり、簡易水冷240mmでも熱落ちしましたので冷却はしっかり考えるべきですHyperVの仮想マシンを9台同時稼働させる予定があるので実現出来たらまた続きを書きます

Enfinnnnn!!!! Un processeur pour montage vidéo 4k, effets en 3d, transition, le processeur flotte, Intel fait pouette pouette, qualité prix, dur à battre, vivre AMD, il me reste de l’argent dans mes poches!!!

Mon processeur fonctionne parfaitement. Attention avant de l'insérer dans votre ordinateur vous devez savoir que le mien était à l'envers dans son support. Ne le sachant pas j'essayais de l'installer ainsi. À force de le manipuler pour le faire rentrer dans le socket de ma carte MSI X399 MEG Creation je l'ai échappé légèrement sur les connecteurs du socket de la carte-mère et je ne savais pas qu'ils étaient si nombreux et petits. Quelques uns sont devenus tout croches. Ils sont tellement petit que je n'ai même pas tenté de les arranger moi-même et je me suis rendu immédiatement chez une bijoutière expérimentée qui me l'a arrangé. Par la suite j'ai tenté à nouveau d'installer mon processeur. Ne comprenant pas pourquoi il ne rentrait pas correctement j'ai regardé des photos sur Internet. En grossissant les images j'ai finalement réalisé que le processeur avait placé à l'envers dans son support orange. Ce fut très facile de le tourner. Il s'est alors parfaitement inséré dans la carte-mère et il roule parfaitement. J'overclock au niveau max automatique de la carte sans problème. J'ai 128 Go sur deux kits 64 Go HX432C16PB3AK4/64.

With the release of AMD 3rd Gen Processors it makes this awesome CPU a better value. If you're a FilmMaker, Content Creator, Editor, or Professional video/photographer this is a serious Workstation processor. With DaVinci Resolve Studio I rip through 4,6, & 8K editing smoothly & easily.

Processore eccezionale. Qualità prezzo ottima. Nessun problema di stabilità. Cercate una soluzione di raffreddamento aria/liquido che possa dissipare il calore emanato, in quanto è molto facile che con overclock minimi il processore scaldi oltre i 68 C (temperatura massima oltre la quale inizia a rallentare)

AMD hit it out of the park with this one. Initially I thought I wanted to get the 2990WX but after doing my research and reading reviews I realized this 2950X was much more suitable for my needs.I put it on the Gigabyte X399 Designare Ex with an Enermax TR4 360 and it’s a rock solid combo. With PBO enabled and RAM using the XMP profiles it scored 3408 in Cinebench with essentially no effort on my part. Temps rarely go above 60c.I've also been running RAID 0 on 2 x Samsung 970 PRO 512GB NVMe PCIe M.2 SSDs. It took a BIOS update and a lot of fiddling to get it working but now it's rock solid and blazing fast.UPDATE: I can no longer recommend the Enermax TR4 360. Mine completely failed after about 5 months causing idle temps to hit 68c and PBO was throttling to 500MHz. Yeah, you read that right 500MHz. I'm now running theNoctua NH-U14S TR4-SP3 with an additional Noctua NF-A15 PWM 140mm fan added and am seeing even better temps than when the Enermax was brand new. Only down side is that it's a huge heat sink and doesn't fit in my case properly without modding the case.

Currently, this CPU is hands down objectively the best at 3D rendering in a single socket (by the metric of time taken to render 3D scenes).In blender cycles, I've had this CPU outpace my dual 1080ti at rendering, 950 vs 693 seconds in a scene I've been using to benchmark.I also do a lot of data processing.Encoding (ffmpeg): depending on the codec used, it can be pretty good, or pretty meh, in the worst cases getting slightly outpaced by the 18 core i9 7980XE in h265. h264 I found was not quite as favorable for the intel cpus though, but something to note is that neither of those codecs actually fully loaded the cpu, 2 of the dies were typically idle, thus the cpu was being treated like a 16-core, and one of the dies was barely loaded, resulting in severe under utilization for the AMD cpu that pushed its boost clocks down, while the intel cpu was able to make use of much higher boosts, since at least the number of threads was much closer to its actual core count. Parallel encoding however swings things back in the favor of the 2990WX though, where it can now fully utilize all the cores. Occasionally some under utilization would happen due to memory bandwidth constraints in some portions of my reference task.NLP Text Preprocessing (Proprietary w/ Python, Numpy): This particular bit of code is unfortunately a custom piece written for my job, so not necessarily directly translatable to what other people may be doing, but running 64 instances of the program in parallel didnt scale how I expected... because my nvme drives couldn't keep up with the IO demands, resulting in CPU under utilization, so not the CPU's fault. I'll need to set up a larger scratch disk array to properly test this.AVX2 deep learning: ok, the 1080tis win out for this workload, but against other cpus the 2990WX can still hold its own... until you bring in the question of AVX512, which is an interesting topic. Sure, AVX512 might be a bit easier to code for than CUDA... in theory, since its still all on the CPU. However AVX512 is not at all easy to code for, or even getting the stuff to compile right. Its also less mature and less supported than CUDA, making.. coding for CUDA arguably actually easier overall. For all the hammering away at some of the problems I was facing, I could only get around half the benchmarks to run on AVX512 intel cpus without crashing. Some of them still produced unexpected outputs. Anyways, verdict is that, while GPUs and dedicated hardware still easily outpace CPUs here, the 2990WX isnt half bad at it either if you cant otherwise use GPUs.Games: it manages a solid 60fps at 4k using dual 1080tis. Cant ask for much more than that. I'm an artist and programmer who games on the side, I like high resolutions, and I dont really play anything that greatly benefits from high fps - it just makes it nicer to watch but provides no tangible benefits for what I play.If you have workloads that benefit from this CPU, you or at least your business probably makes enough money to get this CPU, and in the arena that this CPU fights in, where its battling parts that range from $500 to $10000, its one of the best values there is for workloads its best at.If you also want to game on it, well, its perfectly fine if you just want 60hz or even 90hz (vr), with dynamic local mode bringing it closer to where the 2950X and 2700X sit. Its never going to be a top tier champ of the high refresh rate gaming arena, but thats not what its value proposition is for anyways, theres cpus better at that for much cheaper (2700X, 8700K, and just forget the 9900K even exists since the 8700K is just a few percent slower while not running into the same power/thermal issues as the 9900K - which by the way, actually can use more power (I've seen people reporting up to 265W on the package) than even the 2990WX (peak power draw I've observed is 248W) does at stock settings on a good board under all-core loads, since MCE is a stock setting enabled by default on a lot of those boards that can actually supply it enough power without the VRMs throttling or overheating).

I run a lot of resource-intensive applications that would completely bog down my old i7-4770. The Threadripper 2950x can run everything simultaneously without any stutters or freezes. I can refresh 10+ large Power BI datasets while also crunching numbers with a few instances of Python, stream a football game on mute while listening to my iTunes music library, all while playing GTA5. And that is with stock settings! I haven't found it's limit yet -- it's an absolute monster of a processor. If you are like me an need a processor to run a lot of stuff at the same time (such as virtual machines, video encoding, number crunching, etc) this is a great processor.In summary - Cinebench r15 scores 3150 at stock. 'Nuf said.