Half the price of the retail store and work just the same. Happy with the purchase.

Work well

A while ago we purchased a Canon imageCLASS MF267dw II laser printer. The unit is sold with a single 051 toner cartridge providing retention for approximately 1700 printed pages. Unfortunately not enough. A supplement would need to be found.Toner cartridges are not exactly modestly priced. Despite my indignation, I ventured forth in pursuit of disparately priced duplicates. In this case, I found this Ultra Toner 051 toner cartridge PAIR...for $40 CAD. That...is momentous. A further comparison must be carried out in order to establish distinctions between such overtly priced merchandise. Since I have my original toner which originally accompanied the Canon printer, a direct confrontation could be prepared. And it was.So...how does the Ultra Toner 051 toner compare to Canon's standard 051 production fair? Let's find out. The original 1700 page yield Canon cartridge is the standard 051 derivative making this a fair contest. However, this is not a full amplitude challenge, which would be a colossal waste of time, toner, money and above all, wasted plastic. Rather, this was a rivalry engagement for supremacy in the realms of quality and...compatibility. There's nothing more to evaluate, really. They are just about the same with the Ultra Toner having a significant advantage in pricing.Right. So what do we have? Two 051 toner cartridges for Canon's imageCLASS MF269dw, MF267dw, LBP162dw, MF264dw, etc... If adaptability of the component with other MF and LBP series printers in the product description of the webpage is omitted, they should harmoniously associate with these specimens, as well, however you should confirm your model before purchase. It arrived packaged in a standard, blue and white cardboard box, the typical method of packaging components in a commercially depicting package frequently embraced for marketing, such as the one advertised in the pictures on this product page making the component easily identifiable. Well done.I performed the first leg of testing by printing a few sentences using the original toner, then replaced it with this 051 Ultra Toner unit. Removing the cartridge from the box and relieving it of the protective polyethylene foam flanking the sides and orange plastic bag individually containing the ensemble, I proceeded to remove the protective orange clip and sealing tape. Then I exchanged the cartridges by opening the toner bay on the printer, and simply pulling out the previous tenant. The new cartridge was then effortlessly introduced into the printer bay, snuggling passionately into its mothers cradling arms. I then promptly........waited a minute or so, as the printer affirmed the newcomer is not just a random interloper. Success!Once the printer confirmed through the toner cartridges integrated automatic smart identification chip it's affinity for the new patron, it was ready to output a further deluge of text and visuals onto paper. And this process was seamless, indistinguishable between cartridge brands. A disparity was indisputable upon closer inspection of the emitted inscription. I observed the original toner provided a bolder, darker tone in comparison to its Ultra Toner rival. Although insignificant to myself, some may find this regrettable, and in certain cases, unsuitable. Clarity was once more tantamount, though it could be argued the more effective, bolder original toner print is crisper and sharper, but only to a barely sufficient degree. Objectively.Following this test the cartridges were swapped twice more. This confirmed the printers compatibility procedure is definitively shorter with the original cartridge. Strictly for testing purposes, this in no way depreciates its Ultra Toner counterpart since placing a cartridge in the printer is primarily performed once for an average user, and the waiting period of approximately one infinitesimal minute is inconsequential. Again, operation following this process is routine in all aspects. No graying or ghosting was evident following multiple print tests. No smudges, either, typically found on mobile phone screens after unnecessary YouTube binges during dates! Fingerprints are invasive.What's the verdict? Compatibility: Check. Clarity: Check. Efficiency: Uncharted. Most requirements as defined in the product description are present. The only unconfirmed particular would be the production harvest of 1600 pages expected of a standard yield 051 paradigm. At $40 CAD for a pair of toner cartridges I have austere doubt it can deliver on this claim. Then again......it's only $40 CAD for TWO toner cartridges which combine for a total of 3200 pages. Even if it misses the prescribed mark by 1000 pages between the two, the compromise is still worth the investment. It is also larger in size, with the original model using a handle for insertion, whereas the Chinese model has a cutout within a larger plastic body. Not sure what benefit this design provides but seems like a waste of plastic barring positive effect.I think that's all. And yes, I recommend this product given the price point and capability. Despite my incredulity pertaining to endurance, and a few other minor and negligible shortcomings I can find no credible reason to purchase competing products at higher mark-ups. This is what should be acquired.

Worked well on Brother printer. Good quality.

I use this product for my office Canon printer, copier and scanner. The product is working fine. I like the way the delivery guy delivered the product at the back of my house under the cover of the awning.

This is the right one for Canon MF269dwII. Don't go with other ones.

Très satisfaite du produit.